Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,069.09
(
-0.56%
)
US TECH 100
25,761.20
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
49,232.41
(
-0.43%
)
Brent Oil
93.95
(
3.61%
)
Bitcoin
75,737.97
(
-0.20%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 749756
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Jestiron

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 93
Posts 5667
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/26/2006

Jestiron

Re: barefoot123 post# 225515

Sunday, 07/25/2010 12:30:44 AM

Sunday, July 25, 2010 12:30:44 AM

Post# of 749756
Notice the wording here by THJMW. She specifically states "...by all of the parties who have a stake in this case in connection with the confirmation process..." The use of this verbiage specifically excludes those who were not included in the GSA....meaning common shareholders (and perhaps preferreds) by saying those in connection with the confirmation process!

Mountains out of mole-hills? Perhaps...but to me this was a clear jab at the debtors, JPM, and the FDIC, bondholders, etc.

jest

NOTE: Do not make investment decisions based on the information provided in my posts; past, present, or future.

As Always: "Trust But Verify" -Ronald Reagan

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today