News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 38
Posts 14539
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/09/2002

Re: DewDiligence post# 99050

Wednesday, 07/21/2010 3:32:48 AM

Wednesday, July 21, 2010 3:32:48 AM

Post# of 257253
I believe the short 48 week duration of the ABT study does not capture what I believe is the the durability of Truvada when compared with Isentress, which has a low resistance hurdle when compared with Truvada.

I believe part of this is due to the relative half-life of the drugs, Viread with median 17 hours serum and 60 hour intracellular, compared with 9 hours serum for Isentress and an ill-defined intracellular range of up to 29 hours.

There are known advantages of reduced viral fitness resulting from adapted viral resistance to the shorter-live Emtriva co-drug in Truvada, or the closely related Epivir.

The other portion of reduced Isentress durability lies in the limited number of mutations required to obtain resistance.

Side-effect wise you have kidney toxicity with Viread compared with inflammatory symptoms in many who try Isentress.

It would be great if someone developed a superior complementary therapy to Viread, but I don't see that currently among the contenders.
.

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now