"Remember Gregory Cross is no longer on the suit, he just resolved a question on what the motion for his firm getting paid did (assets or liabilities)."
Would he be allowed to opine on where this case is headed and if he thinks Rosen has been committing BK fraud?
"The shareholders meeting is to replace the incompetent BOD which currently is guiding the direction this BK is heading, plus they are trying to maximize the payout for the BONDHOLDERS by screwing the equity holders."
Does the BOD know what Susman's strategy is? Are they privy to his firm's info or just the EC?
When I say we're paying for Susman I mean it's just less money for shareholders but I feel he is the only hope we have unless the UST steps up and thoroughly investigates Rosen's motives.