Nor were the illegal issuances reported by the Sichenzia firm, a firm populated with former SEC personnel and not named in the litigation as having any culpability even though it had represented Spongetech from the inception of the Spongetech Scam until about mid-2008 and had received over 2,000,000 shares of stock itself as reported in the Spongetech Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2008.