News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 59
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/09/2010

Re: anyhoo post# 14737

Friday, 06/11/2010 6:59:05 AM

Friday, June 11, 2010 6:59:05 AM

Post# of 16651
Found this on Yahoo...

Briefly, under Mesa's contract with Ua Mesa had the right to replace some of the 200's with larger CRJ's. The contract required Mesa to give advanced notice. The substituted aircraft would have extended the contract for the new aircraft.

When UA non-renewed/terminated the contracts with the end of April,2010, Mesa did not have any larger A/C to substitute.

Mesa sent a notice saying that they would have A/C to substitute starting in October 2010. UA said that is not what contract meant.

Ua had found a replacement vendor to do the flying and said
replacement meant put one larger plane in service as you take a 200 out of service.

JO was making noise about his other suits. UA sued for declaratory relief. UA asked the court, in effect to say that they had no further obligation to Mesa under this contract.

It was a "pre-emptive" strike by UA. UA wanted to be sure about Mesa's claim before they signed the final contract with the new vendor.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today