InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253012
Next 10
Followers 837
Posts 120354
Boards Moderated 18
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: zipjet post# 97083

Thursday, 06/10/2010 2:53:24 PM

Thursday, June 10, 2010 2:53:24 PM

Post# of 253012
TEVA MNTA:

My question is whether there is likely to be any causation related to the volume of the injection and the site injuries so common in Copaxone-treated patients.

I would be willing to bet that the standard formulation of 20mg/1mL is better than the new formulation of 20mg/0.5mL from a medical standpoint. (If the reverse were true, Teva would presumably have launched Copaxone with the lower-volume formulation when the drug came to market in the mid 1990s.)

The only bona fide benefit of the low-volume formulation, as far as I can tell, is that it takes half as much time to infuse. Hence, the formulation issue boils down to whether the convenience benefit for the doctor and the patient justifies the risk that the new formulation is less safe.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.