News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257580
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122988
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: genisi post# 96836

Tuesday, 06/08/2010 12:59:06 PM

Tuesday, June 08, 2010 12:59:06 PM

Post# of 257580
Here’s the answer to the MON quiz on insect-refuge cheating. First, some background info: Pending regulatory approval, MON will offer corn growers a 95/5 “Refuge in a Bag” version of SmartStax and an 80/20 ‘Refuge in a Bag’ version of VT Double Pro. (The latter product is intended for growers in the Western US, where the corn rootworm is not a major pest and can be controlled with crop rotation.)

In the Southern US cotton belt, MON sells a cheaper alternative to SmartStax corn called VT Triple Pro, which requires a 50% insect refuge to protect the cotton crop. The clue that corn growers in the cotton belt are cheating on the insect-refuge requirement is that MON does not plan to offer a 50/50 ‘Refuge in a Bag’ version of VT Triple Pro.

MON has a quasi-official reason for not offering VT Triple Pro in a Bag, but the reason is essentially doubletalk. I contend that the real reason MON is not offering VT Triple Pro in a Bag is that such a product would implicitly force Southern US corn growers who are illicitly using a <50% refuge to increase the refuge to 50%, thereby reducing the growers’ overall yield.

As I said in the original post in this thread, this was a hard quiz :- )


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today