News Focus
News Focus
Followers 6
Posts 460
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/05/2010

Re: thredzman1rob post# 4240

Saturday, 06/05/2010 11:36:45 PM

Saturday, June 05, 2010 11:36:45 PM

Post# of 23483
If they responded to any shareholder that they would not be receiving any funding, that would be suicide wouldn't it? You wouldn't send out any information like that unless you are absolutely sure that the company would not be receiving any more furute capital and ultimately be going under. But caution like that is a great thing to have and will keep you on your toes man, so its a good thing to keep up, since were all in this.

As a segway to your point Sum, what you said was a great point; taking the initiative to say that they were a little underfunded to contribute to the clean up does say more for EVXA in comparison to MOPN. it seems that MOPN overplayed their cards when they suddenly had a contract deal, which they hastily jumped in, without the capital to actually fulfill that contract (which could lead to more trouble down the road for them). EVXA would rather respond to shareholders that they wont be getting involved not for just our benefit (benefit in the terms of letting us know) and maybe to not lead on potential investors about the company. To say the least I'm ready for the trading week to begin.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y