As a guy that has spent 35 years in the computer industry, I'll say that those numbers are clearly bad data.
I have already posted why I think that the OTCBB program was malfunctioning.
To add to the things I have already pointed out about that, I'll add this....None of the 80540 individual screens of data had a label on them showing which stock that Data was about.
If you believe that there are over 80 thousand screens of valid data on a stock that hasn't been around for more than 2 years then there is nothing more I can say to convince you.
Not to mention that the same months are listed multiple times with different data each time. That is a certain indicator that the data isn't valid.
BOREDOM, It's a terrible thing to waste.