There is a material difference between "assuming the worst," and fabricating stories about the company ceasing to exist and only continuing the pretense of existence in order to defraud the public and unknowing investors. Surely you can understand the distinction?
Now if you want to criticize the company for not being able to close a deal and generate revs, you will get no disagreement from me. But if you want to claim that the company is a sham designed only to defraud, then you will be told to prove it or STFU.