News Focus
News Focus
Followers 13
Posts 38
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/21/2010

Re: mMax post# 5317

Saturday, 05/22/2010 10:18:17 PM

Saturday, May 22, 2010 10:18:17 PM

Post# of 20489
Okay so I think the difference between both lows has to do with the split. The split was on November 25, 2009. And it was 1:1000 shares.

So Etrade (your number) of .0030 which ocurred in November 11 is the 52week low when you don't adjust the numbers for the split that ocurred.

So Daily Finance has all the prices before the split adjusted for the split. So before the split DF doesn't have the actual prices but has adjusted prices. So instead of .003 on November 11 (which is the actual price at that point in time) the price is adjusted to $3.00 as if the split had already ocurred. If that makes any sense.

I tend to go with the adjusted price for the actual low of .0071 because you can't really compare prices before a split and after a split if they are not adjusted for the split because those prices wouldn't take into consideration the difference in shares. I could go in more depth about this if you want but that is just my interpretation.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y