News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257262
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122802
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: acgood post# 95992

Tuesday, 05/18/2010 7:29:08 PM

Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:29:08 PM

Post# of 257262
BPAX:

If we subscribe to your postulation that the FDA prep for [the flibanserin] advisory committee meeting is what caused the increased requirement for BPAX, then the B-I safety trial looks even more unsatisfactory.

My comment re the flibanserin advisory panel was a wild guess in an attempt to answer the question you posed about the reason for upsizing the LibiGel safety trials; I don’t actually think it’s likely that the flibanserin advisory panel was the reason for the change, but I don’t have a better explanation handy.

In any case, I respectfully disagree with your contention that the flibanserin safety database is lacking. Insofar as the two drugs could scarcely be more different, what the FDA wants to ensure the safety of LibiGel is not a good guidepost for what the FDA wants to ensure the safety of flibanserin.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now