News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257372
Next 10
Followers 2
Posts 47
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/07/2003

Re: AlohaDan post# 6342

Sunday, 01/02/2005 9:04:19 AM

Sunday, January 02, 2005 9:04:19 AM

Post# of 257372
But then why would management be pushing the 1-4% mentioned?

I don't know. Maybe they're telling the truth ;)
It just seems to me that old-style food companies will have razor thin margins and they won't be able to give up a 1% royalty. The only way they could is if

a) the flavor enhancers substantially expanded their markets (very unlikely) and/or
b) the flavor enhancers substantially reduced production costs (i don't know enough about the business of food production to comment on this one)

This also reminds me a little bit of the genomics 'revolution' of the late 90's. You have a new fancy high-throughput screening process that will revolutionize the industry going up against the old-fashioned stuck-in-their-ways flavor chemists. Not to say that the genomics companies didn't shine for a while, but it pays to remember who won that fight.

Going back to the 2-4% royalty. I'd love to hear EXACTLY how they phrase this. I've seen business development people turn bulls*** and loop-hole threading into an art-form.

"Money ain't everything--Unless you don't got any."

-stated philosophy of my father and uncle.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today