InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 797
Posts 39838
Boards Moderated 11
Alias Born 06/20/2009

Re: sensible post# 4538

Friday, 04/30/2010 8:52:24 PM

Friday, April 30, 2010 8:52:24 PM

Post# of 40561

all MEDT needs to do to avoid any problem is show that Forward had an "expectation" and they believed them.

but in that case isn't MEDT doing the same thing to shareholders? by selling shares based on these same "expectsation"s

they aren't claiming "proved" but hoping shareholders believe more so they can sell shares, correct.

MEDT isn't even reporting, so these rules don't apply. Its more like, what do they "feel" they can expect. They don't need to prove anything to make the statements they have made. The simple fact that they aren't claiming "proved" and aren't putting out a series of PR's is enough,MEDT isn't even reporting, so these rules don't apply. Its more like, what do they "feel" they can expect. They don't need to prove anything to make the statements they have made. The simple fact that they aren't claiming "proved" and aren't putting out a series of PR's is enough,

quotes like this from posters that makes me wonder why MEDT & Ari Bass would be trying to cover their a$$ as they continue to sell shares based on "expectations" Trade wisely invest wiser!

I hope both companies flourish! If they do I do.