Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[jpm_sux]

But you seem to be ignoring the fact that the "pre" stockholders decided to sell their shares rather than wait for justice. They sold not only their interest in the company but also their right reap the rewards of their investment.

If in the middle of the Kentucky Derby you decide to sell me your wager ticket and the horse comes in does that mean that you get the winnings?

I am a pre- and post- shareholder and I cannot see a distinction or a valid way to enforce the settlement.

Can you cite a particular instance where pre- sharholders were paid regardless of whether or not they still held the shares?