News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 26373
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/08/2002

Re: tinner post# 478600

Monday, 04/26/2010 2:18:25 PM

Monday, April 26, 2010 2:18:25 PM

Post# of 495952
i thought CONs were also supposed to be responsible people

why do they have no respect for truth and facts?

Obama Derangement Syndrome Quantified
Wingnuts | Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:18:28 am PDT
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/36235_Obama_Derangement_Syndrome_Quantified

The tidal wave of right wing nuttiness directed at Barack Obama has been a recurring subject at LGF recently, and here’s some evidence that it isn’t just a matter of perception. Blogger J. L. Bell took a look through Snopes.com, the website that investigates and debunks rumors of all kinds, and discovered a huge difference in the number of false rumors about Obama compared to other Presidents.

To keep on top of urban myths of all kinds, I subscribe to the Snopes.com update list, and I noticed a pattern there that I thought deserved to be examined more arithmetically. It struck me I was seeing a lot more rumors about President Obama, and a lot more false rumors, than I remembered from earlier years. So I ran the numbers, as of this week.

After eight years in the White House (with Snopes.com around all that time), George W. Bush has been the subject of 47 internet rumors. After less than two years in office, Barack Obama has been the subject of 87, or nearly twice as many.

Even more telling is the relative accuracy of those stories. For Bush, 20 rumors, or 43%, are true. Only 17, or 36%, are false. The remainder are of mixed veracity (4), undetermined (4), or unclassifiable (2).

In contrast, for Obama only 8 of the 87 rumors, or 9%, are true, and a whopping 59, or 68%, are whoppers. There are 17 of mixed veracity and 3 undetermined.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today