News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 842
Posts 122793
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: mcbio post# 94261

Saturday, 04/17/2010 5:42:04 PM

Saturday, April 17, 2010 5:42:04 PM

Post# of 257253
VRUS IDIX:

Obviously not apples-to-apples as this is a 28-day study [of PSI-7977] compared to a 14-day study for IDX184, but any comments on these results compared to the IDX184 results?

I think the results to date are roughly comparable, which means that PSI-7977 is indeed serious competition for IDX184. After 28 days of IDX184+SoC, I think the RVR numbers using equivalent doses of IDX184 will likely be about as good as the RVR numbers for PSI-7977 reported in #msg-49048250.

Just to be clear: the phase-2a IDX184 study does have 28 days of overall treatment, but IDX184 is given for only the first 14 days (i.e., 14 days of IDX184+SoC followed by 14 days of SoC only). Thus, the IDX184 study cannot provide an RVR metric for the IDX184+SoC regimen, and this is why it’s an apples-to-oranges comparison to the PSI-7977 study.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now