InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252455
Next 10
Followers 832
Posts 119964
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: mcbio post# 94261

Saturday, 04/17/2010 5:42:04 PM

Saturday, April 17, 2010 5:42:04 PM

Post# of 252455
VRUS IDIX:

Obviously not apples-to-apples as this is a 28-day study [of PSI-7977] compared to a 14-day study for IDX184, but any comments on these results compared to the IDX184 results?

I think the results to date are roughly comparable, which means that PSI-7977 is indeed serious competition for IDX184. After 28 days of IDX184+SoC, I think the RVR numbers using equivalent doses of IDX184 will likely be about as good as the RVR numbers for PSI-7977 reported in #msg-49048250.

Just to be clear: the phase-2a IDX184 study does have 28 days of overall treatment, but IDX184 is given for only the first 14 days (i.e., 14 days of IDX184+SoC followed by 14 days of SoC only). Thus, the IDX184 study cannot provide an RVR metric for the IDX184+SoC regimen, and this is why it’s an apples-to-oranges comparison to the PSI-7977 study.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.