News Focus
News Focus
Followers 3
Posts 626
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/21/2002

Re: ChrisC_R post# 49571

Wednesday, 12/22/2004 12:14:51 AM

Wednesday, December 22, 2004 12:14:51 AM

Post# of 98353
Chris,
Andi Kleen, the author of the orginal article had this to say
about the Inq piece:

"All I can say is that they badly misinterpreted many
of my statements. A lot of the stuff written there
has no base in what the slides say. There was also
no intention to bash any of the CPU vendors. I guess
they were looking for sensations when there weren't any
(perhaps a slow news day?)

The only bashing that's in there is some mild (was intended
to be funny actually) criticism of the respective marketing
departments for the naming mess (x86-64, amd64, x86-64, em64t, ia32e, CT, ... what will VIA and Transmeta come up with?)

-Andi"

http://www.realworldtech.com/forums/index.cfm?action=detail&PostNum=2971&Thread=2&entryI...

It sounds like its not really a problem.

Regards,
Smallpops

Smallpops

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News