The “phase-2” trial (quotation marks intentional) includes 36 patients in the second-line setting and is hardly what I would consider a serious effort (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01058512 ):
• There is no control arm, so it will be impossible to compare NOV-205 to the SoC.
• There are only 9 patients in each arm.
• Assignment to one of the four monotherapy arms is not randomized.
• Standard efficacy metrics such as RVR/EVR/SVR are not endpoints (and might not even be reported).
In short, this is effectively a phase-1b trial being disingenuously characterized as a phase-2 in order to hoodwink unsophisticated investors.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”