InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251720
Next 10
Followers 44
Posts 4529
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2006

Re: biomaven0 post# 92941

Tuesday, 03/23/2010 12:02:38 AM

Tuesday, March 23, 2010 12:02:38 AM

Post# of 251720
first off thanks for the link - i haven't read it yet but plan to

as for compaxone - while "no 2 molecules are identical", the final product obviously has some consistent batch to batch efficacy, so there must be some parameters within which the various ratios/sequences/number of peptides fall. so proving sameness entails proving that your manufacturing process results in the same (or less) degree of variability in the end product to the original. i have to think MNTA has looked at many many lots of copaxone - applied their characterization technology to assess how each lot varies from one to the next - to the point where they know these parameters, and reverse engineered a manufacturing process that yeilds an end product that is indistinguishible from the branded product insofar as the variability batch to batch is identical (i.e. no batch falls outside these parameters that in essence "define" the product)
the same holds true for lovenox, another product comprised of a mixture in which no 2 batches are identical

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.