InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252431
Next 10
Followers 44
Posts 4595
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2006

Re: genisi post# 92900

Monday, 03/22/2010 8:47:21 AM

Monday, March 22, 2010 8:47:21 AM

Post# of 252431

How would MNTA prove the generic product is identical without conducting trials?



the same way any generic small molecule company does - by showing that the generic contains the identical API. I agree this is more difficult than lovenox in that you don't know the MOA, have no in vitro diagnostic tests to measure activity like you do with lovenox (anti Xa/IIa activity),...BUT i also don't think it is quite the same level of complexity as traditional biologics that have both protein and sugar moities. in fact, for glycoproteins, proving the AA backbone of the structure is the easy part, but the variability in glycosylation between cell culture systems is what introduces the variability to make it more difficult to prove sameness without trials. Here you don't have that problem - so even though it is a mix of peptides, i think if you can show that you have the identical mix in the soup one can assume activity is the same because you don't have the difficulty in proving glycosylation patterns won't affect the activity of the final product

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.