I am seeing the possibility of bartering for oil and gas again rear its head.
Chavez of Venezuela, a long time user of the barter system, has just recently returned from a trip to Russia and now Putin approves 'Gas for Goods'. We will see if this barter system is implemented and if Iran follows.
Bartering along with the diversification of currency reserves away from dollars are two weapons other countries can effectively use against the United States.
Background:
2) More developing countries follow the lead of Venezuela and China in diversifying their currency reserves away from dollars and balanced with euros. Such a shift in dollar-euro holdings in Latin America and Asia could keep the dollar and euro close to parity.
7) Developing countries lacking dollars or "hard" currencies follow Venezuela's lead and begin bartering their undervalued commodities directly with each other in computerized swaps and counter trade deals. President Chavez has inked 13 such country barter deals on its oil, e.g., with Cuba in exchange for Cuban health paramedics who are setting up clinics in rural Venezuelan villages.
#msg-2499236
As for the events currently taking place in Venezuela, items #2 and #7 on the above list may allude to why the Bush administration quickly endorsed the failed military-led coup of Hugo Chavez in April 2002. Although the coup collapsed after 2 days, various reports suggest the CIA and a rather embarrassed Bush administration approved and may have been actively involved with the civilian/military coup plotters.
Venezuela is the fourth largest producer of oil, and the corporate elites whose political power runs unfettered in the Bush/Cheney oligarchy appear interested in privatizing Venezuela's oil industry. Furthermore, the establishment might be concerned that Chavez's `barter deals' with 12 Latin American countries and Cuba are effectively cutting the U.S. dollar out of the vital oil transaction currency cycle. Commodities are being traded among these countries in exchange for Venezuela's oil, thereby reducing reliance on fiat dollars. If these unique oil transactions proliferate, they could create more devaluation pressure on the dollar. Continuing attempts by the CIA to remove Hugo Chavez appear likely.
The U.S. economy has acquired significant structural imbalances, including our record-high trade account deficit (now almost 5% of GDP), a $6.3 trillion dollar deficit (60% of GDP), and the recent return to annual budget deficits in the hundreds of billions. These factors would devalue the currency of any nation under the `old rules.' Why is the dollar still predominant despite these structural imbalances? While many Americans assume the strength of the U.S. dollar merely rests on our economic output (i.e. GDP), the ruling elites understand that the dollarÅfs strength is based on two fundamentally unique advantages relative to all other hard currencies
The reality is that the strength of the U.S. dollar since 1945 rests on it being the international reserve currency. Thus it assumes the role of fiat currency for global oil transactions (ie. `petro-dollar'). The U.S. prints hundreds of billions of these fiat petro-dollars, which are then used by nation states to purchase oil/energy from OPEC producers (except Iraq, to some degree Venezuela, and perhaps Iran in the near future). These petro-dollars are then re-cycled from OPEC back into the U.S. via Treasury Bills or other dollar-denominated assets such as U.S. stocks, real estate, etc. In essence, global oil consumption provides a subsidy to the U.S. economy. Hence, the Europeans created the euro to compete with the dollar as an alternative international reserve currency. Obviously the E.U. would like oil priced in euros as well.
#msg-994080
-Am
Russia Approves 'Gas for Goods'
12.07.2004 Tuesday
Critical decisions that favor Turkey have emerged from the negotiations between Turkey and Russia that took place during Russian President Vladimir Putin's historic visit to Ankara.
The off-set system that was included in a 1984 natural gas agreement but neglected since 1994, has been made operational via negotiations between energy delegates from both countries. Energy bureaucrats convinced the Russians to guarantee signatures on exports in exchange for a $1 billion part of bought natural gas. The two nations will cooperate in order to reduce the effect of exceedingly increasing oil prices on natural gas prices to a minimum. Within this framework, Turkey will re-negotiate with Russia to curb natural gas prices starting in 2005. Russia claimed that it was not the addressee of the 1984 natural gas agreement, but that it was signed by the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and said Russia started to receive hot money for natural gas that it sold since 1994. Russia rejected Turkey's concerns on the issue by saying "There is no exchange practice or barter in international trade." An agreement was reached during yesterday's negotiations to allow recognition of the 1984 natural gas agreement and its operation and of the 3rd Article making barter between the two countries possible. This has paved the way first of all for Turkey to export to Russia for $1 billion. According to the agreement reached yesterday, the amount of $ 1billion, the equivalent to a portion of natural gas Turkey once purchased from Russia, will be held in Russia's Central Bank. The amount will be paid out to Turkish companies for exports to Russia.
Issues under discussion between Russia and Turkey were clarified. Important steps in building cooperation between the two nations were taken, specifically on energy. According to reports, a memorandum of understanding was signed between Botas and Gazprom in Ankara as a supplement to the Mixed Economy Protocol signed in Russia earlier. Botas and Gazprom decided to make joint investments in natural gas. Another critical element of the negotiations was the possibility to construct alternative pipelines thereby ending use of the Straits. The "Samsun-Ceyhan" pipeline project is focused on this issue. The Trans-Thrace pipeline was also a topic of discussion. The two sides also reached a consensus on joint investment in Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). Experts working for Botas and Gazprom will cooperate on the construction of an LNG terminal in Ceyhan in the next step and Turkey's underground gas storage potential will be researched, primarily in the area beneath Lake Salina in Central Anatolia.
12.07.2004
Ramazan Solak
Ankara
http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&trh=20041207&hn=14524
Chavez of Venezuela, a long time user of the barter system, has just recently returned from a trip to Russia and now Putin approves 'Gas for Goods'. We will see if this barter system is implemented and if Iran follows.
Bartering along with the diversification of currency reserves away from dollars are two weapons other countries can effectively use against the United States.
Background:
2) More developing countries follow the lead of Venezuela and China in diversifying their currency reserves away from dollars and balanced with euros. Such a shift in dollar-euro holdings in Latin America and Asia could keep the dollar and euro close to parity.
7) Developing countries lacking dollars or "hard" currencies follow Venezuela's lead and begin bartering their undervalued commodities directly with each other in computerized swaps and counter trade deals. President Chavez has inked 13 such country barter deals on its oil, e.g., with Cuba in exchange for Cuban health paramedics who are setting up clinics in rural Venezuelan villages.
#msg-2499236
As for the events currently taking place in Venezuela, items #2 and #7 on the above list may allude to why the Bush administration quickly endorsed the failed military-led coup of Hugo Chavez in April 2002. Although the coup collapsed after 2 days, various reports suggest the CIA and a rather embarrassed Bush administration approved and may have been actively involved with the civilian/military coup plotters.
Venezuela is the fourth largest producer of oil, and the corporate elites whose political power runs unfettered in the Bush/Cheney oligarchy appear interested in privatizing Venezuela's oil industry. Furthermore, the establishment might be concerned that Chavez's `barter deals' with 12 Latin American countries and Cuba are effectively cutting the U.S. dollar out of the vital oil transaction currency cycle. Commodities are being traded among these countries in exchange for Venezuela's oil, thereby reducing reliance on fiat dollars. If these unique oil transactions proliferate, they could create more devaluation pressure on the dollar. Continuing attempts by the CIA to remove Hugo Chavez appear likely.
The U.S. economy has acquired significant structural imbalances, including our record-high trade account deficit (now almost 5% of GDP), a $6.3 trillion dollar deficit (60% of GDP), and the recent return to annual budget deficits in the hundreds of billions. These factors would devalue the currency of any nation under the `old rules.' Why is the dollar still predominant despite these structural imbalances? While many Americans assume the strength of the U.S. dollar merely rests on our economic output (i.e. GDP), the ruling elites understand that the dollarÅfs strength is based on two fundamentally unique advantages relative to all other hard currencies
The reality is that the strength of the U.S. dollar since 1945 rests on it being the international reserve currency. Thus it assumes the role of fiat currency for global oil transactions (ie. `petro-dollar'). The U.S. prints hundreds of billions of these fiat petro-dollars, which are then used by nation states to purchase oil/energy from OPEC producers (except Iraq, to some degree Venezuela, and perhaps Iran in the near future). These petro-dollars are then re-cycled from OPEC back into the U.S. via Treasury Bills or other dollar-denominated assets such as U.S. stocks, real estate, etc. In essence, global oil consumption provides a subsidy to the U.S. economy. Hence, the Europeans created the euro to compete with the dollar as an alternative international reserve currency. Obviously the E.U. would like oil priced in euros as well.
#msg-994080
-Am
Russia Approves 'Gas for Goods'
12.07.2004 Tuesday
Critical decisions that favor Turkey have emerged from the negotiations between Turkey and Russia that took place during Russian President Vladimir Putin's historic visit to Ankara.
The off-set system that was included in a 1984 natural gas agreement but neglected since 1994, has been made operational via negotiations between energy delegates from both countries. Energy bureaucrats convinced the Russians to guarantee signatures on exports in exchange for a $1 billion part of bought natural gas. The two nations will cooperate in order to reduce the effect of exceedingly increasing oil prices on natural gas prices to a minimum. Within this framework, Turkey will re-negotiate with Russia to curb natural gas prices starting in 2005. Russia claimed that it was not the addressee of the 1984 natural gas agreement, but that it was signed by the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and said Russia started to receive hot money for natural gas that it sold since 1994. Russia rejected Turkey's concerns on the issue by saying "There is no exchange practice or barter in international trade." An agreement was reached during yesterday's negotiations to allow recognition of the 1984 natural gas agreement and its operation and of the 3rd Article making barter between the two countries possible. This has paved the way first of all for Turkey to export to Russia for $1 billion. According to the agreement reached yesterday, the amount of $ 1billion, the equivalent to a portion of natural gas Turkey once purchased from Russia, will be held in Russia's Central Bank. The amount will be paid out to Turkish companies for exports to Russia.
Issues under discussion between Russia and Turkey were clarified. Important steps in building cooperation between the two nations were taken, specifically on energy. According to reports, a memorandum of understanding was signed between Botas and Gazprom in Ankara as a supplement to the Mixed Economy Protocol signed in Russia earlier. Botas and Gazprom decided to make joint investments in natural gas. Another critical element of the negotiations was the possibility to construct alternative pipelines thereby ending use of the Straits. The "Samsun-Ceyhan" pipeline project is focused on this issue. The Trans-Thrace pipeline was also a topic of discussion. The two sides also reached a consensus on joint investment in Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). Experts working for Botas and Gazprom will cooperate on the construction of an LNG terminal in Ceyhan in the next step and Turkey's underground gas storage potential will be researched, primarily in the area beneath Lake Salina in Central Anatolia.
12.07.2004
Ramazan Solak
Ankara
http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&trh=20041207&hn=14524
Discover What Traders Are Watching
Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
