News Focus
News Focus
Followers 5225
Posts 24469
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 09/20/2000

Re: Er0ck post# 26292

Thursday, 03/04/2010 3:52:17 AM

Thursday, March 04, 2010 3:52:17 AM

Post# of 233825
Er0ck, with this KATX thought...

Wow! I can't believe I am over 500 posts behind again.

Besides that, what you posted should be read by everyone a few times to fully understand just what it is that you are saying here with KATX.

The question is no long about wondering if KATX has gold. The question is now about how much gold does KATX has.

This is huge and you are very correct. Having 31.4 grams per ton is huge. I think I simply need to echo your post below.

v/r
Sterling

****************************************************************

Posted by: Er0ck Date: Monday, March 01, 2010 1:42:18 PM
In reply to: Biochemist2002 who wrote msg# 26288 Post # of 26874

I am not sure if they rate rock samples as "ppb" as they are rocks not soil but 31.4 grams per ton is massive. And heres the important thing about it. The soil sample containted close to 6 g/t, so they took the rock sample from underneath the same area that they got the 6 g/t reading from and found 31.4 grames per ton in the rock.

With this type of deposit the deeper you go the more gold you should find until you reach a certain level. The fact that they found roughly 6 times more gold in the rock right under the soil with the highest readings is very impressive and would strongly indicate that there is much more under that in the other rock layers and could go down 100s of meeters.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y