News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 1
Posts 125
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/18/2009

Re: msdrugs4 post# 91011

Tuesday, 02/23/2010 7:14:53 AM

Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:14:53 AM

Post# of 257253
Nothing I have recently read changes my personal outlook for a Cladrabine of FTY-720

Cladrabine has no chance for approval without a 2nd trial. An almost 1% cancer rate (in a drug with a known cancer link) compared to 1 ZERO rate in the control group. Take away ALL of the other safety signals, that alone is the basis to request a 2nd trial. If they started today, a second 2 year phase 3 trial would take 1 yr to enroll, 2 years to run, 3/4 yr of data collection and filing, 1 year for FDA review. 5 Years or 2015-16 at the earliest. Say good bye to Cladrabine, IMO.

FTY 720 reported a myiad of side effect in the one phase 3 trial run in the US. By contrast, the FREEDOM 1 trial (run exclussively OUTSIDE the US) demonstrated a much cleaner safety profile. At a minimum, the FDA review of FTY -720 will require upwards of 1 year (despite the priority review). You can be sure of a panel and extensive RISK MAP. That pushes a final decision a few months (march 2011) before release of the second large 2 YEAR phase 3 trial - FREEDOMS 2 trial, with the majority of patients from the US. I can't imagine the FDA approving FTY BEFORE reviewing the results of the 2nd large phase 3 trial. Why should the FDA risk an earlier approval especially with the divergent safety results from the first trials?? Especially after the Tysabri experience.

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now