Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,165.08
(
0.80%
)
US TECH 100
26,538.40
(
1.85%
)
Dow Jones
49,230.71
(
-0.16%
)
Brent Oil
100.77
(
-0.75%
)
Bitcoin
79,040.70
(
0.49%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 749756
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

ABIGIDIOT

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 10839
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 02/14/2009

ABIGIDIOT

Re: itsmikie post# 153182

Tuesday, 02/23/2010 12:08:53 AM

Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:08:53 AM

Post# of 749756
your argument is predicated on two different scenarios.

check back a few of my posts, first off, and see why "a share is a share, is a share", which correlates with ricksy.

per the argument, this is where you are way off.


i was a pre bk shareholder, with a 4000.00 investment.

i'm also a post bk shareholder with a 45,000.00 investment.


the shares get cancelled, which of my investments lost more?

i.e., what you are putting forth, is just not congruous.

TPG GETS PAID, ABIGHAMMER GETS PAID !!!


Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today