News Focus
News Focus
Followers 30
Posts 4543
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/22/2004

Re: uis_aol_money post# 1323

Saturday, 11/27/2004 9:01:43 PM

Saturday, November 27, 2004 9:01:43 PM

Post# of 2878
uis_aol


Yes, I did speak to Ratchinsky last week. He would not answer a lot of questions. He said he could not because an audit was ongoing. If you don't believe me, ask him.

Quite frankly, you owe me an apology for your false allegation. I will be looking for that in your next post.

Do I seriously think Search123 and Interchange would deal with a less than reputable company?

Quite possibly...there are 300,000 advertisers in INCX's exchange and over 225 distribution partners. They cannot possibly know everything about every company with which they are involved. I hope you are not suggesting that every advertiser is telling the truth about their product or every search engine is completely transparent to INCX.

They said they would go on NASDAQ soon, they didn't do it.

They said they would have a national advertising campaign, they haven't done much.

They said they would have a mobile search engine, have you been to the site?

Yes, they used to say they wanted to be on NASDAQ, but that has since been removed from the site.

The president says an audit is ongoing but other posters claim IR told them an audit was not going on and the company was going to save its money by _not_ going on NASDAQ.

Do you see the discrepancies here?

Quite frankly, one cannot get on NASDAQ without an audit, financial reports, and a $4 share price. How soon is that likely to happen? Pumpers last summer were implying it could happen any moment. They were either utterly deluded or outright liars,as any child could see, and the company should have come down on them hard.

Keep laughing if you want, but if you don't apologize we will know who is telling the truth.









Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y