News Focus
News Focus
Followers 153
Posts 12276
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/02/2007

Re: tykundegex post# 26411

Tuesday, 02/16/2010 2:59:16 AM

Tuesday, February 16, 2010 2:59:16 AM

Post# of 312101
IMO he is just trying to get the share issue straight stumiller-- there is nothing in regulations that I see that does not make the shares free-tradable soon... the only argument is if he will live up to the agreement and given what people are saying about his character, I question that...

If Steve is correct 1.) it does not appear illiegal, and 2.) even if it were so, SEC enforcement action typically doesn't happen for a few years after the incident(s)

So truth be told you are on your own from a present-time trading perspective. Read the filings and read the rules associated with holding times; it's pretty clear...

What is however a little fuzzy is the REGDEX 506 placement using assumed treasury shares that the CEO turned over-- haven't come across that kind of transaction before. Added to that was the consummation that apparently occurred in August but wasn't finalized until Dec-- interesting and you don't have the actual agreement so you can't get a firm commitment to "hold period."

... and I wonder if there even is one considering the shares came from the treasury...
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y