News Focus
News Focus
Followers 131
Posts 40045
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/19/2003

Re: reginoo post# 294814

Monday, 02/15/2010 8:12:02 PM

Monday, February 15, 2010 8:12:02 PM

Post# of 346955
With some exceptions, EXACTLY!! I think he was buying on behalf of a client or group that had reason to cover up some prior misdeeds.

if Pike covered the 160 million share short that you claim it had with the buys shown in the SEC filings then it would show a net zero position for Pike, not the long 160 million shares that it is showing now...

"Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt"

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today