My Other Collection

[gloe]

Excuse me, but Wikipedia is not exactly a good source for accurate information, since anyone can write anything they want there.

"The regimen was reported to be ineffective compared to chemotherapy in a controlled, observational study published in August 2009. No discussion of compliance with the regimen was included in the publication. Patients receiving the Gonzales protocol died three times faster than those receiving conventional chemotherapy, in addition to reporting significantly worse quality of life.[7]"

The exact opposite happened. Conventional doctors, the Cancer Establishment, and those in their pockets, HATE alternative therapies and will attack anyone who advocates their use. The fact is, that except for childhood leukemia and some other rare cancers, the "War on Cancer", which has cost this country probably hundreds of billions of dollars, has been a tragic failure. Sort of like the "War on Drugs" and the "War on Terrorism" (so far).

I don't have cancer, and I don't have to follow all of his treatments, but if I did have cancer I would do his cancer program in a heartbeat, rather than submit to what goes by the name of conventional, modern cancer "treatment." No thanks.

If his treatment is so horrible and ineffective, why is his office flooded with requests from people begging to become a new patient -- and all by word of mouth. He does no advertising or promotion of himself or his work. He is a serious, caring, brilliant doctor and scientist.

If you respond to this with any more inaccuracies about this doctor, I will remove your posts. I merely posted about a new effort in the U.S. Congress to restrict or remove our freedom of choice to take nutritional supplements. I will not get into a pissing match with you or anyone else about "alternative" medicine in general, or any one doctor in particular.