InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1061
Posts 44342
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 07/07/2002

Re: augieboo post# 159

Saturday, 08/17/2002 11:01:18 PM

Saturday, August 17, 2002 11:01:18 PM

Post# of 495952
Augie, it was not Just Reagan (and he stopped shipment of arms for a period), but the rest of the "enlightened" world. As for Hitler and the Sudetenland, the equivalent here was Iraq invading Kuwait, and unlike Chamberlain we initially reacted correctly, and if we had gone all the way to take him out then, that would had been quite fine, now that he is boxed, you need to wait until he does another Kuwait, or else, you trigger all over the world "justifications" for solving regional problems by force under the pretext of "preemptive" strikes.

Israel is said to possess nuclear devices (according to the US Government, Israel never admitted to that publicly), will that possession or alleged possession justify, let say, Syria to carry on a preemptive strike against Israel? If we go after Saddam here, you lay the ground work for such a Syrian preemptive strike in the future, with impunity, since you set a new lower threshold to the doctrine of preemptive defensive attacks. Period.



Zeev


AZH

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.