To be sure, most Americans – and, unfortunately, most members of Congress – believe that the Social Security trust fund contains real assets that can be drawn upon to pay future benefits. But the Social Security “trust fund” is like the federal highway trust fund and some 110 other federal funds, merely an accounting device and not an actual financial entity. The Clinton administration’s FY 2000 budget put the issue very clearly:
These [Trust Fund] balances are available to finance future benefit payments and other Trust Fund expenditures – but only in a bookkeeping sense. ... They do not consist of real economic assets that can be drawn down in the future to fund benefits. Instead, they are claims on the Treasury that, when redeemed, will have to be financed by raising taxes, borrowing from the public, or reducing benefits or other expenditures. The existence of large Trust Fund balances, therefore, does not, by itself, have any impact on the Government’s ability to pay benefits. (FY 2000 Budget, Analytical Perspectives, p. 337).
Even Clinton gets it. The Trust Fund is in reality nothing, it's an accounting tool. It has no effect on the liquidity of the Social Security system. It has been been a political tool to give the average citizen a false sense of security concerning the solvency of Social Security. My point; my only point.
The rest of your post (in particular this part) is ???????? You're off on a tangent:
Almost forgot, it's too bad there isn't $20 trillion in the Social Security Trust. If there were we could claim Social Security solvent thru the remainder of the century. Wouldn't that be great!