USCI WILL GENERATE $$$$$soon READ:
the players in kuwait &saudia&phillipines are numerous locals +international
kuwait:
local :Subsidiaries of Kuwait Petroleum Corp. include: Kuwait Oil Co. (KOC), Kuwait National Petroleum Co., Petrochemical Industries Co. (PIC), Kuwait Oil Tanker Co., Kuwait Foreign Petroleum Exploration Co. (Kufpec), and Kuwait Petroleum International (KPI, London
international:
British Petroleum Co. Plc
Chevron
Getty Oil Co.
Gulf Oil
Japan's Arabian Oil Co. (AOC)
Mobil Corp.
Royal Dutch/Shell,
Shell International Petroleum Co. Ltd.
Texaco
Total
for saudia:
local:
Saudi Aramco
Samarec
Petromin
Petromin Lubricating Oil Refining Co. (Luberef), [Mobil Oil Corp. holds a minority interest in this company]
Petromin Lubricating Oil Co.,
Saudi Arabian Basic Industries (Sabic)
Original Concession Holders:
Arabian American Oil Company, Socal, Texas Oil, Jersey, Socony-Vacuum
For Saudi portion of Neutral Zone: Getty Oil Co., Japan Petroleum Trading Co.
Joint Ventures:
Star Enterprise (U.S.) Saudi Refining Inc. (50%), Texaco (50%);
Ssangyong Oil Refining Co. (S. Korea) Saudi Aramco (35%), Ssangyong (65%); Luberef - Mobil (30%) and Petrolube - Mobil (29%)
Samref, an export fuels company- Mobil is a 50% shareholder
Subsidiaries: Aramco Services Co. (Houston), Aramco Overseas Co. (Netherlands), Saudi Petroleum International Inc. (New York), Saudi Petroleum Overseas Ltd. (London/Tokyo)
international:Mobil
Shell
and finally the phillipines :The Philippine National Oil Company (PNOC) is the country's state-owned energy company responsible for oil and development of local energy resources. Petron, privatized in 1994, is considered to be the country's largest oil refining company, with Shell and Caltex also significant. National Power Corporation (NPC) is the state-owned electric company.
Major Foreign Energy Company Involvement: Caltex, Royal-Dutch Shell, Petroleum Authority of Thailand, TotalFinaElf
ALL THOSE 3 COUNTRIES HAVE ONLY ONE PLAYER IN COMMON : SHELL
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT SHELL IS THE MARKETING COMPANY NOT NAMED BY THE PR UNDERGOING TRIALS ON THE TM GENERATORS IN THOSE COUNTRIES AND DON'T WANT TO APPEAR ITS NAME BEFORE RETRIEVING POSITIVE RESULTS ??!!!!any thoughts
CAUSE NAMES DR MEEK DOESN'T LACK OF THEM ACCORDING TO THIS LIST
FROM ALL THE GUYS WHO CALLED THE IR ARLETTA HAD NEVER MENTIONNED THAT DR MEEKS TRAVELLED IN ORDER TO STRIKE A DEAL.THE DEAL WAS SIGNED ON DOMESTIC GROUND .
SHELL IS THE CANDIDAT IN MY OPINION RUMORS TALKED ABOUT AN EXXON-MOBIL DEAL BUT MOBIL IS NOT PRESENT IN THE PHILLIPPINES AS EXPLORER.
SHELL CANNOT PUT ITS NAME BEFORE PROVEN CONCEPT=RETRIEVING OIL FROM STRIPPER WELL
is SHELL the marketing company?
the only international oil company present in saudia ,kuwait,and phillipines is SHELL.
till our last knowledge DR MEEKS didn't travel to sign the marketing agreement (many guys called the IR &ARLETTA never mentionned that he travelled for negociations)so i presume that the agreement was sign on US ground.
if the PR MENTIONED only SAUDIA &kuwait i would have add to my list MOBIL or maybe some local company but the presence of the phillipines in the deal made all my thoughs oriented to SHELL.
the phillipines is divided for the big local operator PNOC,SHELL &caltex and totalfinaelf.and thai company.
the only way for usci to market its TM technology in those 3 countries under the SAME MARKETING COMPANY is to go through SHELL .
SHELL is the only one present in those 3 countries at the same time.
THE QUESTION THAT WE ARE ASKING :why not naming it in the PR ?
in order to answer this question we should go through another question:
what is the role of a marketing company?
let us see it the simple way it market products for companies that desires to enter an established network of sales.
in usci case let's take the case that a company who owns stripper wells in saudi ,kuwait&phillipines and is interested in trying the TM technology on its wells who do they call?where are the number &address of the marketing company mentionned by the PR .
there aren't why?
cause this marketing company is already established in those countries and have its own wells through contracts with local owners and will have all those owners pay for this new techology.
THE LAST PR IS NOT A MARKETING AGREEMENT IT IS A DEAL BETWEEN USCI &a company well established in those countries having its own customers base that is going to extend its already existing contracts with those locals to the TM technology.
contracts are going to come soon and will be numerous cause they are not newly signed but will be only an extension of old contracts between them &the marketing company.
WHY I AM DOUBTING THAT SHELL IS THIS MARKETING COMPANY?
1-SHELL is the only foreign company based in those 3 countries.
2-the 49 % share for usci of the agreement !!!usci has 49% & 51 % for the marketing company?!!! of course we are talking about a big fish with a lot of stripper wells in those countries.when you are guaranteed of a high number of contracts you could easily leave 51% on the table!!!
the fact that that the marketing agreement was not named is not an issue anymore cause in my point of view we are about to have a lot of contracts signed at the same time soon .
if this will be the case that means that SHELL might be the one behind this agreement.
NB :ALL THOSE INFORMATIONS ARE BASED ON MY PERSONNAL DEDUCTIONS ,DO YOUR OWN DD BEFORE PUTTING YOUR MONEY AND GL
AI
