News Focus
News Focus
Followers 251
Posts 2749
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2006

Re: rramirez82 post# 141752

Wednesday, 01/27/2010 9:28:34 AM

Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:28:34 AM

Post# of 749756
The other 10 billion should be the IRS claim which is meritless. How could wmi be getting nol refunds if this claim were legitimate. As to the piercing of the corporate veil, wmi is/was a bank holding company not a nickel and dime home-repair contractor corporation with a thousand dollar capital contribution. Look how the regulators tried to indirectly pierce with the cayman's ---and that doesn't work because of the bankruptcy courts avoidance powers. So imho piercing the corporate veil is damn near impossible with wmi.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today