If Bloomberg actually said Obama's bank tax is "aimed squarely" at the city's lifeblood, he either doesn't understand the rationale for the tax, is misstating the notion of "aimed squarely" or is trying to justify why the city's budget hasn't been reined in.
This from someone who has no problem taxing individuals who can much less afford it.
If an industry is giving people "obscene" bonuses, it's a reasonable sign that the industry has determined it can afford it.
Or the bonus money is really not from the failing industry but from the average taxpayer.
This administration wants to tax the banks, because it views the recent bonuses as excessive.
Where were the Democrats and Obama when Franklin Raines and Jamie Gorelick were collecting extravagant bonuses and compensation from government-run Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?
Some estimate that, due to the multiplier effect, a $100 billion tax on the banking system will remove almost $1 trillion from the economy -- money that won't be available for loans and credit.