sugarpea - your answer is right in what you posted. if i might address,...
you wrote "The company was very similar to the one that gave the award to Calypso back in September"
very similar in format but most undoubtedly has the clout that Frost & Sullivan does not. in otherwords when this company talks they are placed on CNBC so people will listen. like saying the painting is just like picasso,...ah,...but picasso did not paint it and it does not have the same value.
you wrote "I was thinking how Calypso Wireless would not have gotten an award for its innovation from this company because it doesn't meet these standards. I wonder what kind of standards the other company uses to have awarded Calypso Wireless an award."
there are alot of companies out there that create a second tier of "market buy alerts" to investors in the pinksheet and otcbb market. i submit that is all that occured. another futile attempt by CLYW's management to float this boat for as long as they can by using a sub-standard company.
red flag #1 no workable prototypes (yet constant excuses as to why and when it will occur,..right ;^),...red flag #2 because of no workable prototypes there is no ability to capture new revenue in a short of even long time span from these innovations.red flag #3,...not worth my time to post them all.
in concept the ASNAP technology was a possibility,... now,...they've been left in the ethers by their own mismanagement. these are small minds dealing with the real business world. any business person knows it is the workable prototype that creates interest not a patent.
stick a fork in it,...and i don't mean because it close to thanksgiving.
invest at your own risk, based on your own due diligence, at your own risk tolerance