News Focus
News Focus
Followers 29
Posts 9421
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/30/2006

Re: HALF FULL GLASS post# 24806

Saturday, 01/02/2010 6:33:29 PM

Saturday, January 02, 2010 6:33:29 PM

Post# of 30387
Half full, you seem to not be able to realize you have made a bad investment. When Abbott elected to not take RECAF into trials, that was the end of any potential for the product. Why did they keep the license? Maybe you should ask Moro why Abbott was not required to pay the 2008 minimum royalty. I think he esentially paid them with forgoing the minimum royalty to keep the license.

If this test had anywhere near the potential that Moro claims, Abbott would certainly have proceeded and Inverness would have put it on their mass analyzers also. This test is not going to sell in China or he would have already been selling the tests. Chinal is highly regulated and there is no way he can sell any tests there.

You are just looking at manual tests with Dog RECAF and if he blows the money from this offering on POC devices or anything else as dumb, he will be out of money again within a year.

There is no imaging or therapeutics. Moro cannot get any of those patents approved. If a universal marker was going to be successful, DR70 would be selling and so would Haah. Both companies are about to go broke.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today