InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 701
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/25/2003

Re: peace_2_all post# 11995

Sunday, 11/07/2004 12:50:36 PM

Sunday, November 07, 2004 12:50:36 PM

Post# of 64738
Good Morning Peace2All. I'm not sure what you are saying ... sorry, but sometimes I'm a little slow in discearnment ... lol.

Let me make a run at clarifying what I meant.

IF CYGX made the deal it appears to me that they made with PP and promised the support and cooperation that PP would have needed and then later CYGX discovered that a bigger, better company might be willing to make a better deal than the one PP had negotiated, they should have stood by their word and assisted PP in every way they could ... even if it meant extending the duration of their original agreement IF the delays had been caused in any manner by CYGX.

If you are saying what I think you are saying, I agree that CYGX would now have great difficulty in negotiating with any other company. We have to hope that CYGX did everything they could to assist their licensee in this instance, and that they can document their willing participation and cooperation.

Also, could you clarify what you meant in this clause:

. May be PP's hope is this route, but I believe PP is missing one point here and that is NO OTHER HONORABLE ENTITY WOULD GO INTO A DEAL KNOWING THAT CYGX HAS ALREADY MADE SUCH A DEAL WITH ANOTHER CO. WOULD ANY ONE OF YOU IF YOU WERE A CEO OF A CO? I WON'T,
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.