News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257262
Next 10
Followers 7
Posts 996
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/06/2004

Re: mcbio post# 88236

Monday, 12/28/2009 6:08:00 AM

Monday, December 28, 2009 6:08:00 AM

Post# of 257262
SBS/MDCO

McBio, I think you have a valid point.

You said,
I'm not sure where you get that Sembiosys doesn't have the intellectual property to develop ApoA1.

Upon further digging, I am concluding that Sembiosys believes it has patent on the ApoA1 Milano VARIANT it engineered in proprietary, genetically modified safflower.

From the PR this week:
...SemBioSys' Apo AI(Milano) product is different
and distinct from that in-licenced by The Medicines Company, ...

Also, from some older PR's is this explanation:
SemBioSys' proprietary
safflower-derived Apo AI(Milano) is a des-1,2- variant of Apo AI(Milano) as
previously described in the literature.


By contrast, The Medicines Co I presume owns the patent on the human form used in Esperion's early research.

So, working from the assumption that both companies have valid IP and effective drugs, I suggest the problem from an investment perspective, is whether either company can find the right path to develop a game changing approved drug . My bias at this point is that SBS is interesting as a potential acquisition, though it's a guess whether it would be as a take-over or take-out (to kill it) strategy.



Urche

Where Real Traders Talk Markets

Join thousands of traders sharing insights, catalysts, and charts.

Join Today