News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 49
Posts 5519
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2006

Re: DewDiligence post# 88036

Wednesday, 12/23/2009 1:56:34 PM

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 1:56:34 PM

Post# of 257253
idix

i think this is a net positive since it confirms the compound is moving forward (not that there was huge doubt in the first place since the drug was licensed fairly recently), but the JV does have a basketfull of drugs to mix and match so it is reassuring that the idix compound still seems likely to be an integral part of development plans moving forward
a possible minor delay in the start of such a study is really trivial imo
PS: the negative one can make of this is that lower doses than 100 did not have sufficient efficacy. i personally don't consider this clinically relevant since 100 is SUCH a low dose already and should easily lend itself to coformulation (in fact i was surprised they even bothered to examine lower doses - unless another agent they hoped to combine with idix899 required much higher dosing??)

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now