InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252642
Next 10
Followers 45
Posts 4612
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2006

Re: DewDiligence post# 88036

Wednesday, 12/23/2009 1:56:34 PM

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 1:56:34 PM

Post# of 252642
idix

i think this is a net positive since it confirms the compound is moving forward (not that there was huge doubt in the first place since the drug was licensed fairly recently), but the JV does have a basketfull of drugs to mix and match so it is reassuring that the idix compound still seems likely to be an integral part of development plans moving forward
a possible minor delay in the start of such a study is really trivial imo
PS: the negative one can make of this is that lower doses than 100 did not have sufficient efficacy. i personally don't consider this clinically relevant since 100 is SUCH a low dose already and should easily lend itself to coformulation (in fact i was surprised they even bothered to examine lower doses - unless another agent they hoped to combine with idix899 required much higher dosing??)
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.