News Focus
News Focus
Followers 323
Posts 19225
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/08/2002

Re: lastdog post# 10922

Friday, 12/18/2009 11:30:54 AM

Friday, December 18, 2009 11:30:54 AM

Post# of 46247
lastdog:imo actually it is up to the company to verify what they put in writing as a PR is correct, if they put out false info then that is their bad and up to them to correct it. Note they the company did NOT retract that bad info, merely took part of it off their website and left part of it on.

Imo If there was litigation involved all parties would likely be named, and if investors bought on false company furnished information then imo the company, along with the source of the bad information should be held accountable.

I think if you check with a lawyer that is how the law works. That is supposed to be the reason why the company has an IR to proof the PRs and then they get signed off by SB. Note FC when continually asked for PROJECT updates on facebook said she would have to check with IR/SB jmho

Gen. Patton
"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country.
He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y