lastdog:imo actually it is up to the company to verify what they put in writing as a PR is correct, if they put out false info then that is their bad and up to them to correct it. Note they the company did NOT retract that bad info, merely took part of it off their website and left part of it on.
Imo If there was litigation involved all parties would likely be named, and if investors bought on false company furnished information then imo the company, along with the source of the bad information should be held accountable.
I think if you check with a lawyer that is how the law works. That is supposed to be the reason why the company has an IR to proof the PRs and then they get signed off by SB. Note FC when continually asked for PROJECT updates on facebook said she would have to check with IR/SB jmho
Gen. Patton
"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country.
He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."