9/11 Reality

[kashasha]

>>so you think the data is fixed?<<

I would have thought that the excerpts I chose might have given some clue as to why I think the data has been manipulated. Here's a paragraph from a comment under the article about data at Darwin which summarizes my thoughts:

>>‘This paper judiciously, ruthlessly, relentlessly and scientifically demonstrates the true nature of the difference between raw data and adjusted data where temperature records are concerned. Given that the raw data shows cooling whilst adjusted temperature shows rapid warming, would you agree that until ALL raw data for ALL sites used in the three global temperature record organisations GISS, CRU and GCHN are made public, examined critically by INDEPENDENT parties and the nature of the adjustments understood, that NO DECISIONS CONCERNING GLOBAL ACTION ON SUPPOSED GLOBAL WARMING SHOULD TAKE PLACE?’<<

As far as whether is would be worth your time to debate me on this subject, it wouldn't. If you'd like a debate, I'd suggest the comment section of any article to which you take exception that appears here:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/climategate/

Since I went OT and made a couple of comments about subject issue, I definitely feel that it is your right to rebut, giving your reasons why you think data has not been manipulated. You may have some good information that needs to be considered.