InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 820
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/06/2001

Re: AndrewL post# 78424

Sunday, 10/31/2004 1:46:33 AM

Sunday, October 31, 2004 1:46:33 AM

Post# of 495952
"Problem is, once GW & co. took their decision to "go get 'em" public, instead of building a strong coalition through standard diplomatic channels while the weapons inspectors continued to moniter activity on the ground, they went headlong into it like cowboys with guns blazing to the consternation of most of the international community

You people & your revisionist history. And to think you will
vote based on a false perception of reality. That's not very
smart IMO.

The inspectors hit the ground & immediately began to document
evidence of "Material Breaches". As time passed the number
of "Material Breaches" grew in number & seriousness.

UN Resolution 1441 made it clear what the consequences were
for even one "Material Breach". Saddam was required to
unconditionally & immediately comply fully to every aspect of
UN Resolution 1441. He chose utter defiance.

As for your DNC Talking Point about this so-called "strong
coalition", it was a strong coalition. We weren't able to
convince governments that were in bed with Saddam. They took
bribes from & sold illegal weapons to Saddam, ET AL & got
quite rich in the process.

There was nothing Bush or anyone could do to bring these
corrupt governments on board.

Perhaps you have ignored all news about the Oil-for-Food
scandal. Perhaps you have ignored the evidence from the Iraq
Survey Group.

It's obvious you listen to the lies & disinformation Michael
Moore types, Team Kerry & the DNC.

Your POV is dead wrong. Your source of these known lies are
those you plan to vote for.

Pretty scary, 'eh?


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.