InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252499
Next 10
Followers 832
Posts 119983
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: randychub post# 87245

Wednesday, 12/09/2009 11:44:15 PM

Wednesday, December 09, 2009 11:44:15 PM

Post# of 252499
If MNTA/NVS got the sole approval for generic Lovenox, MNTA could strictly speaking afford to fund the M118 program on its own. But even then, it probably wouldn’t be a good decision to do so. Under the Lovenox scenario we are talking about, MNTA would immediately turn profitable. Investors would value the stock based on the expected earnings per share, which would be considerably higher if someone other than MNTA were funding the M118 program.

Moreover, MNTA does not have a lot of in-house expertise in designing and conducting large clinical trials in ACS. The probability of the M118 program’s ultimately being successful is increased if an experienced partner is on board.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.