News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 510
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/13/2009

Re: choir610 post# 160842

Wednesday, 12/09/2009 1:25:04 PM

Wednesday, December 09, 2009 1:25:04 PM

Post# of 162848
4kids...here ya go..

Jones 'acquisition/IB firm:
Jones deal had ZERO chance to close- AERP had NO FUNDS and was deeply entrenched in RED INK. NO visible means to fund JONES acquisition and NO IB WAS EVER NAMED. If you have proof to refute any of this post away!

Longs claimed they had 'located' the IB firm:

No IB firm was EVER NAMED, not named by AERP and not named by 'longs'. (Both the company and a few longs claimed IB firm was in play but NEVER named one)

Original shareholders vouching for bh:

LOL, who claimed communication with these 'originals'? Would it not be that posters responsibility to provide 3's?

ALPS disappearing act:

Are you saying they didn't? LOL

Claims of HUGE SHIPMENTS arriving daily:

plenty of posts state this yet falling revenue and out-of-stock issues are backed up by website and SEC FILINGS-read them!

New Facility 'build-out'/ vacated building:

Never was completed and YOU know this! And yes, AERP VACATED the building, and you know this as well!

"short-squeeze':

Posted here ad-nauseam' yet NEVER happened. But, you know this.. or are you saying there was a 'short-squeeze'?

Flo-co deal= Good news:

Again, poster here OFTEN, yet there is an INDEMNIFICATION clause dumping ANY legal issue back in AERP's lap per the 8K which is on file with the SEC.

so..again, what are you refuting as being speculative? TIA

just thinking out loud.


Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today