InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 505
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/16/2009

Re: forthe post# 3342

Monday, 12/07/2009 10:21:40 AM

Monday, December 07, 2009 10:21:40 AM

Post# of 6427
Where did I imply that you did? My first post was in reply to the guy who said they would have to buy them back. Then you send a reply asking where I read that they were buying them on the open market.

"where did you read that ,buy back shares in open market ,those shares were part of out standing due to be free trading in january ,the deal was recinded meaning ,meaning the shares go back to treasury and the value for the shares meaning i assume a project goes back to who was to recieve the shares leaving now only 27 mil shares free trading . 80 mil that were reg144 due to come out free in jan cancelled ,what are you talking about open market"

I never said they had to buy them on the open market. I asked how could they buy them back if they ARE NOT ON THE OPEN MARKET? Thus refuting the other guys claim. Is it that hard to surmise that the reply was for the issue he raised? Just because someone replys to a post you wrote doesn't mean that it is intended soley for you. Get a grip.