News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257268
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122806
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: rwwine post# 4398

Friday, 10/29/2004 8:19:15 AM

Friday, October 29, 2004 8:19:15 AM

Post# of 257268
>> Possible drug interactions with squalamine that were previously unobserved? <<

I didn’t detect anything along those lines. Rather, I sensed Levitt’s backing off to some degree from prior assertions that it’s reasonable for investors to expect Squalamine to blow away the competition by improving vision for a substantial proportion of patients by 3+ lines relative to baseline (the standard definition of improved vision). At R&R, Levitt seemed almost resigned to the fact that no single therapy is likely to triumph over AMD and that stabilization of vision is a more realistic goal.

Is this new posture related to the lowering of the Squalamine dose from 40-80mg in the phase-1/2 trial, to 20-40mg in the “209” phase-2 trial, to 10-40mg in the “208” and “207”phase-2 trials? That’s what I am trying to ascertain.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today