News Focus
News Focus
Followers 40
Posts 13588
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/08/2002

Re: Troutbum post# 11616

Wednesday, 10/27/2004 1:57:58 PM

Wednesday, October 27, 2004 1:57:58 PM

Post# of 18420
And the embedded reporters say that the explosives were ALREADY missing when our troops arrived at Al Qaqaa, 19 months ago.

That's a neat trick, since the unit commander says they never searched the place.



from Josh Marshall

(October 26, 2004 -- 10:52 PM EDT // link // print)


The lede in tomorrow's Times story about al Qaqaa ...

       White House officials reasserted yesterday that  
380 tons of powerful explosives may have
disappeared from a vast Iraqi military complex
while Saddam Hussein controlled Iraq, saying a
brigade of American soldiers did not find the
explosives when they visited the complex on
April 10, 2003, the day after Baghdad fell.
       But the unit's commander said in an interview  
yesterday that his troops had not searched the
facility and had merely stopped there for the
night on their way to Baghdad.

And then there's this ...

       President Bush's aides told reporters that  
because the soldiers had found no trace of the
missing explosives on April 10, the explosives
could have been removed before the American
invasion. They based their assertions on a
report broadcast by NBC News on Monday night
that showed video footage of the 101st arriving
at Al Qaqaa.
       By yesterday afternoon, as Mr. Bush made his  
way through Wisconsin and Iowa, his aides had
moderated their view, saying it was a "mystery"
when the explosives disappeared. They said that
it could have happened before or after the
invasion and that Mr. Bush did not want to
comment on the matter until the facts were
known.

Reduced to hanging their hat on the say-so of the NBC News crew. Splendid.

Much more on this, this evening. But for now, those grafs above pretty much say it all, don't they?

-- Josh Marshall

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today