News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257293
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122814
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: randychub post# 86755

Friday, 11/27/2009 11:40:12 PM

Friday, November 27, 2009 11:40:12 PM

Post# of 257293
MNTA:

[FDA] would trust/distrust both companies equally. So can you see any reason that MNTA would have any advantage over TEVA for approval as fully characterized Lovenox.

As mouton said, trust has nothing to do with this.

Teva’s written response to SNY’s Lovenox Citizen Petition indicates that Teva wants the FDA to define sameness as the same degree of inhibition of Factor Xa and Factor IIa as in branded Lovenox. On the other hand, SNY argues—and MNTA agrees—that the FDA should define sameness as the same degree of all of the constituents in branded Lovenox, not just FXa and FIIa.

I think this answers your question.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today