SPP119 - I like your overall position that Gas is Good and supported by your global outlook for increased consumption of NG while at the same time improving the carbon inprint on the Earth we live on.
I also believe that had you put a value or potential value on "the huge and very huge" NG discoveries in the JDZ it would have been been received better then your "mostly gas" statements.
You did give some clues as to what a commercial JDZ NG consolidation equates to in tcf's. (How many tcf's)?
As your sources have told you that there are "Huge" NG discoveries in the JDZ, they may have also told you what "huge" really means. Now I know that you can not give a $ value as that will be dertermind by the markets over the next 10 - 15 years.
By holding back on a potential gas figure in (tcf's), that could have been converted into oil equivalents, you have alienated some of the board members who are now questioning your stock trading motives. I "don't" think that is how you wanted your Huge claims to be interpreted.
You have the ability to rectify the position some of the posters have taken to try and discredit you, "Please" convert "Huge and Very Huge" discoveries into potential oil equivalents.
Remember this board, for over (10) years, has Oil as the primary term used in measureing their potential return on investmet.
If you can, Please solve for the potential value of "X" as in "X" tcf's.
We can do the math from there.
JMHO
Tap
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
