Intel Corp (INTC)

[Elmer Phud]

Says the guy who steadfastly refuses to consider the content of section 3.5 of the settlement...

Once again you are terribly confused. You made a statement that there will be more legal action of Intel doesn't "cut the sh*t":

But if Intel doesn't "cut the sh*t", they will find themselves back in court again.

http://siliconinvestor.advfn.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=26098068

You refer to section 3.5 as proof. Can you show us where in Section 3.5 it is established that any sh*t, as you put it, actually took place? That was your wishful thinking and you mistook it for reality as you have a way of doing. If Intel breaks the law in the future then obviously they will be accountable but the same goes for AMD. So to use your reasoning, if AMD doesn't "cut the sh*t" they will find themselves back in court again. Read section 3.5